Full Article Text
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&1/6Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought'Belle'Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle'ON THE TOWN ** out of **** THE BELLE OF AMHERST ** out of ****ON THE TOWN ** out of **** LYRIC THEATREHow can you fail with On The Town? This bubbly, classic musical is filled with great musical numbers and abook by Comden and Green with music by Leonard Bernstein, comic characters that allow numerous actors toshine, lots of dancing and to top it off sailors in their navy whites on leave in New York City. It's the next bestthing to being in New York during Fleet Week (when in fact, it feels like the entire town is merely the backdrop toan immersive performance of On The Town sans -- sadly -- dancing sailors).And yet, the show has never been successfully revived since its debut at the tail end of World War II (followedby the rather different but wonderful film in 1949). According to the indispensable Internet Broadway Database,On The Town's original run lasted just over one year. A revival in 1971 lasted barely two months. The George C.Wolfe revival in 1998 (which I was crazy about when I saw its incarnation as part of Shakespeare in the Park)barely made it to three months. So if this new edition lasts four months (it began in Pittsfield, Massachusetts andcame to Broadway on the tailwind of a rave in the New York Times), it'll be the most successful revival yet!Given reportedly strong reviews across the board, that should happen.But the year-long success of the original seems out of reach for a show that falls dramatically short in evokingNew York City or creating any real magic beyond some talented actors doing their best in flat surroundings.Certainly no one -- not even Wolfe -- has recreated the era in which the story first took place, the wartimeambiance in which the knowledge that these kids on leave might never return should color the entire light-hearted proceedings and give this lark some emotional undercurrents.Still, there's always "New York, New York."Three pals are on shore leave in New York City before heading out, presumably to the Pacific. Gabey (the verylikable Tony Yazbeck) becomes obsessed with meeting Ivy Smith (Megan Fairchild, principal dancer with NewYork City Ballet), aka Miss Turnstiles of June, a girl he sees on a poster in the subway.His buddies Chip (Jay Armstrong Johnson, who was great in Wild Animals You Should Know) and Ozzie (ClydeAlves) put aside their obsessions -- sight-seeing and girls girls girls, respectively -- to make their friend's dreamcome true. They split up, have adventures and reunite in Times Square for a big night on the town until theinevitable last minute rush up the gangplank to their ship and future destiny as war hero veterans or the honoreddead.A huge, insurmountable problem becomes clear right at the start. The scenic and projection design of BeowulfBoritt is genuinely shoddy and unimaginative in the extreme. Boritt has done work I love (such as on TheScottsboro Boys, just debuting in the West End to deserved acclaim). But here the cavernous space of the Lyricfeels...empty. Godawful projections meant to evoke the city streets as Chip and cab driver Hildy (Alysha
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&2/6Umphress) careen about are without charm. If you didn't see the outline of the Empire State Building, you'd haveno idea where they were. The cityscape looks like some bad '80s video game as indiscriminate blobs ofbuildings trudge by.A scene evoking stores like Macy's and Saks is similarly generic, as is every look at brownstones, the bottom ofthe city where you can catch a ferry and spot the Statue Of Liberty (whose torch is presumably indicating whichway the wind blows since it points in one direction rather banally) and on and on. The fantasy sequence whereGabey and Ivy dance amidst supposed luxury? It's indicated by some hanging tinsel and vague cardboardcutouts lowered from the ceiling you slowly realize are supposed to be chandeliers of some sort.Though the costumes of Jess Goldstein hint at a cartoon evocation of the city, there's no sense this is anidealized or playful New York City of our dreams a la Guys And Dolls. It's a generic backdrop where TimesSquare, the Natural Museum of History (which is just weird looking -- why is one section closed off for repairs,you wonder?), Carnegie Hall's rehearsal space (looking like the set of a tired farce) and other iconic locationslooking nothing like the real thing and certainly nothing like an imaginative spin on them. It unmoors the entireevening when the only time you feel like you're actually in New York City is after you leave.Another flaw is Fairchild as Ivy. The demands on her are quite modest. She has to deliver a few lines and be aconvincing object of desire. But in a flat, tepid Broadway debut Fairchild can barely deliver her dialogueconvincingly and has none of the stage presence she evokes at the NYCB. As an actress, she's a very gooddancer.That puts the other gals front and center, where they happily reside. The show's few bright spots definitelyreside with Umphress as Hildy and Elizabeth Stanley as the scientifically minded but man-crazy Claire DeLoone. They're best when paired with their romantic love interests, such as Hildy's iconic "I Can Cook Too" andClaire's "Carried Away." The wonderful Jackie Hoffman -- looking like a dead ringer for Edna Mode from TheIncredibles) -- was pushing too hard here for the laughs as Ivy's cynical voice coach. When she was asked towalk into walls and stumble around looking for an exit, one felt for this talented performer.Notably, no one hits a home run. And a great deal of the show feels like filler, from the beauty pageant that feelslike a time killer in Act One to the endless, exhausting parade of identical nightclubs in Act Two. Similarly, theorchestra under music director and conductor James Moore sounds terrific. But opening the evening with thenational anthem felt like pandering when the rest of the evening didn't even bother to remind us a war was on.And their Act Two opening with another overture felt like more padding.The choreography of Joshua Bergasse was workmanlike, but rarely more. I've no idea whether the act twodance number/dream ballet sequence is lifted or inspired by Jerome Robbins or completely original. But in thiscontext, it felt divorced from the characters and what was going on dramatically (why exactly would Gabey andIvy be boxing? They barely know each other). For me it had no emotional impact.That said, the energetic chorus of dancers (often doubling and tripling in various roles) was the strongestelement of the entire show. Here at least director John Rando was focused and imaginative, giving them bits ofbusiness and specific characters to play while dancing or singing or simply sitting and watching a show in acabaret as background; they did their work flawlessly.I've barely mentioned Yazbeck, which is a shame since this should have been the show to put him in a newleague. He's affable and sweet, though without a girl we care about, his would-be romance has no pull. He andJohnson and Alves are all fine, really, though the show's idea of sex-hungry sailors begins and ends with thepelvic thrust. Yazbeck does shine on his big ballads, especially "Lonely Town" in the middle of Act One. Randoplaces actors throughout the theater, wandering around in isolation and softly joining in as Yazbeck sings aboutthe angst of being alone. I believe sound designer Kai Harada deftly drops out Yazbeck's mike at one point sohe's singing with little or no amplification at a key moment, making him sound more vulnerable and alone than
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&3/6ever. Happily, he has a booming, old-fashioned voice more than up to the task.One other song hints at the heights this show can reach: the two pairs of lovers are riding on the subway toGabey's rescue when they realize time is slipping away and the sailors will soon be going back on board and offto war. They sing the wistful ballad "Some Other Time" with real poignancy. It's a rare moment of emotion for ashow with a generic set, what feels like lots of filler and a desperate desire to yuk it up before we've even begunto know the people at hand.Having seen the joyous '98 revival, I know this show isn't dated or not up to its reputation. Of course not everynight on the town can be memorable. But every production of On The Town should be; the songs, the story andthe brilliant original production are too rich to accept anything less.THE BELLE OF AMHERST ** out of **** WESTSIDE THEATREThe plays of William Luce are resolutely out of fashion. He's been on Broadway four times but never verysuccessfully in commercial terms. Often one-person shows about a famous figure (I would say "always" butBarrymore has two characters and another has some off-stage voices), they are dead cheap to stage, catnip foractors wanting to tackle an iconic figure while chewing the scenery and perennial favorites in regional theatersaround the world, I presume.Actor John Barrymore, writer Isak Dinesen, flapper Zelda Fitzgerald, playwright Lillian Hellman, author CharlotteBronte, war hero Patton: Luce has done them all in one form or another. Most famously, he did poet EmilyDickinson in a one-woman show that the great Julie Harris won a Tony for and happily toured the country withfor many years.Now The Belle Of Amherst returns with Joely Richardson as the reputedly hermit-like but actually vivid poetesswho is here to share a recipe or two, joke about her reputation with the locals and quote liberally from her poetryand letters to give a sense of the rich emotional life enjoyed by one of America's greatest poets. (Only WaltWhitman rivals Dickinson in influence. All others descend from them.)I'd never seen Harris on stage or in the PBS taping of this show. I've never read a biography of Dickinson andonly know her life in the most broad brushstroke terms. So Richardson might have done just about anything. Aslong as it was internally consistent and convincing, I would have been happy. Still, somehow I don't imagineDickinson was like this.Often seen as a virtual hermit, Dickinson has been revealed to have numerous passions and disappointmentsdespite rarely wandering from her door. She had a deep apparently epistolary romance with a married man thatcame to nought, a lengthy exchange with the editor of The Atlantic Monthly that led to professionaldisappointment after he insisted her poems weren't truly worthy (he also dissed Whitman), a distant mother, aloving father, a co-dependent sister who freaked out at the possibility of Dickinson ever leaving and so on.Between all that and gossipy locals, life wasn't so dull for Dickinson.But Richardson strives so mightily to inject emotion and passion and turmoil into the words of Dickinson, that theresult seems hyper-dramatic and overwrought. I've admired Richardson onstage -- most recently in the ClassicStage Company's Ivanov. Here she seems unprepared and entirely at sea. The performance I saw includednumerous stumbles over the text, beginning at the start and right up to the climactic recitation of Dickinson'sfamous "Because I could not stop for Death."My temptation is to blame the play. Luce's stumbling over the life of Dickinson in this production felt ramblingand incoherent. Fact follows fact with no rhyme or reason and it would seem a challenge to remember thisrambling recitation of details. That editor of The Atlantic? His imminent arrival is the finale of act one andimmediately dealt with in act two. The one, true love? He's barely introduced as her heart's real passion before
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&4/6it's all over. Did Emily mention her father loves animals? No, she hadn't and why should we care? A distantmother? Discussed briefly and then it's resolved because as mother grew frail, Emily was able to establish somelong-sought intimacy.One-person shows about famous folk often devolve into "and then I did...." Perhaps a more focused tale thatzeroed in on her crushing reception by the editor of The Atlantic would have created more drama for this story.Certainly Richardson is at her best as Dickinson realizes not only won't he publish her work but he doesn't thinkanyone else should either.Too often, random moment follows random moment, with Richardson either making a hash of the poetry orinjecting melodrama into a voice that -- in poetry -- surely is better evoked as wry and intelligent and coolyobservant, whatever the demands of the stage.The poet who wrote this is someone I'd love to meet:"Faith is a fine invention When Gentlemen can see-- But Microscopes are prudent In an Emergency.Sadly, she is not present in The Belle of Amherst.THEATER OF 2014Beautiful: The Carole King Musical ***Rodney King *** Hard Times ** 1/2 Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead ** I Could Say More * The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner ** Machinal *** Outside Mullingar *** A Man's A Man * 1/2 The Tribute Artist ** 1/2 Transport ** Prince Igor at the Met ** The Bridges Of Madison County ** 1/2 Kung Fu (at Signature) ** Stage Kiss *** Satchmo At The Waldorf *** Antony and Cleopatra at the Public ** All The Way ** 1/2 The Open House (Will Eno at Signature) ** 1/2 Wozzeck (at Met w Deborah Voigt and Thomas Hampson and Simon O'Neill) Hand To God *** Tales From Red Vienna ** Appropriate (at Signature) * Rocky * 1/2 Aladdin *** Mothers And Sons ** Les Miserables *** 1/2
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&1/6Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought'Belle'Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle'ON THE TOWN ** out of **** THE BELLE OF AMHERST ** out of ****ON THE TOWN ** out of **** LYRIC THEATREHow can you fail with On The Town? This bubbly, classic musical is filled with great musical numbers and abook by Comden and Green with music by Leonard Bernstein, comic characters that allow numerous actors toshine, lots of dancing and to top it off sailors in their navy whites on leave in New York City. It's the next bestthing to being in New York during Fleet Week (when in fact, it feels like the entire town is merely the backdrop toan immersive performance of On The Town sans -- sadly -- dancing sailors).And yet, the show has never been successfully revived since its debut at the tail end of World War II (followedby the rather different but wonderful film in 1949). According to the indispensable Internet Broadway Database,On The Town's original run lasted just over one year. A revival in 1971 lasted barely two months. The George C.Wolfe revival in 1998 (which I was crazy about when I saw its incarnation as part of Shakespeare in the Park)barely made it to three months. So if this new edition lasts four months (it began in Pittsfield, Massachusetts andcame to Broadway on the tailwind of a rave in the New York Times), it'll be the most successful revival yet!Given reportedly strong reviews across the board, that should happen.But the year-long success of the original seems out of reach for a show that falls dramatically short in evokingNew York City or creating any real magic beyond some talented actors doing their best in flat surroundings.Certainly no one -- not even Wolfe -- has recreated the era in which the story first took place, the wartimeambiance in which the knowledge that these kids on leave might never return should color the entire light-hearted proceedings and give this lark some emotional undercurrents.Still, there's always "New York, New York."Three pals are on shore leave in New York City before heading out, presumably to the Pacific. Gabey (the verylikable Tony Yazbeck) becomes obsessed with meeting Ivy Smith (Megan Fairchild, principal dancer with NewYork City Ballet), aka Miss Turnstiles of June, a girl he sees on a poster in the subway.His buddies Chip (Jay Armstrong Johnson, who was great in Wild Animals You Should Know) and Ozzie (ClydeAlves) put aside their obsessions -- sight-seeing and girls girls girls, respectively -- to make their friend's dreamcome true. They split up, have adventures and reunite in Times Square for a big night on the town until theinevitable last minute rush up the gangplank to their ship and future destiny as war hero veterans or the honoreddead.A huge, insurmountable problem becomes clear right at the start. The scenic and projection design of BeowulfBoritt is genuinely shoddy and unimaginative in the extreme. Boritt has done work I love (such as on TheScottsboro Boys, just debuting in the West End to deserved acclaim). But here the cavernous space of the Lyricfeels...empty. Godawful projections meant to evoke the city streets as Chip and cab driver Hildy (Alysha
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&2/6Umphress) careen about are without charm. If you didn't see the outline of the Empire State Building, you'd haveno idea where they were. The cityscape looks like some bad '80s video game as indiscriminate blobs ofbuildings trudge by.A scene evoking stores like Macy's and Saks is similarly generic, as is every look at brownstones, the bottom ofthe city where you can catch a ferry and spot the Statue Of Liberty (whose torch is presumably indicating whichway the wind blows since it points in one direction rather banally) and on and on. The fantasy sequence whereGabey and Ivy dance amidst supposed luxury? It's indicated by some hanging tinsel and vague cardboardcutouts lowered from the ceiling you slowly realize are supposed to be chandeliers of some sort.Though the costumes of Jess Goldstein hint at a cartoon evocation of the city, there's no sense this is anidealized or playful New York City of our dreams a la Guys And Dolls. It's a generic backdrop where TimesSquare, the Natural Museum of History (which is just weird looking -- why is one section closed off for repairs,you wonder?), Carnegie Hall's rehearsal space (looking like the set of a tired farce) and other iconic locationslooking nothing like the real thing and certainly nothing like an imaginative spin on them. It unmoors the entireevening when the only time you feel like you're actually in New York City is after you leave.Another flaw is Fairchild as Ivy. The demands on her are quite modest. She has to deliver a few lines and be aconvincing object of desire. But in a flat, tepid Broadway debut Fairchild can barely deliver her dialogueconvincingly and has none of the stage presence she evokes at the NYCB. As an actress, she's a very gooddancer.That puts the other gals front and center, where they happily reside. The show's few bright spots definitelyreside with Umphress as Hildy and Elizabeth Stanley as the scientifically minded but man-crazy Claire DeLoone. They're best when paired with their romantic love interests, such as Hildy's iconic "I Can Cook Too" andClaire's "Carried Away." The wonderful Jackie Hoffman -- looking like a dead ringer for Edna Mode from TheIncredibles) -- was pushing too hard here for the laughs as Ivy's cynical voice coach. When she was asked towalk into walls and stumble around looking for an exit, one felt for this talented performer.Notably, no one hits a home run. And a great deal of the show feels like filler, from the beauty pageant that feelslike a time killer in Act One to the endless, exhausting parade of identical nightclubs in Act Two. Similarly, theorchestra under music director and conductor James Moore sounds terrific. But opening the evening with thenational anthem felt like pandering when the rest of the evening didn't even bother to remind us a war was on.And their Act Two opening with another overture felt like more padding.The choreography of Joshua Bergasse was workmanlike, but rarely more. I've no idea whether the act twodance number/dream ballet sequence is lifted or inspired by Jerome Robbins or completely original. But in thiscontext, it felt divorced from the characters and what was going on dramatically (why exactly would Gabey andIvy be boxing? They barely know each other). For me it had no emotional impact.That said, the energetic chorus of dancers (often doubling and tripling in various roles) was the strongestelement of the entire show. Here at least director John Rando was focused and imaginative, giving them bits ofbusiness and specific characters to play while dancing or singing or simply sitting and watching a show in acabaret as background; they did their work flawlessly.I've barely mentioned Yazbeck, which is a shame since this should have been the show to put him in a newleague. He's affable and sweet, though without a girl we care about, his would-be romance has no pull. He andJohnson and Alves are all fine, really, though the show's idea of sex-hungry sailors begins and ends with thepelvic thrust. Yazbeck does shine on his big ballads, especially "Lonely Town" in the middle of Act One. Randoplaces actors throughout the theater, wandering around in isolation and softly joining in as Yazbeck sings aboutthe angst of being alone. I believe sound designer Kai Harada deftly drops out Yazbeck's mike at one point sohe's singing with little or no amplification at a key moment, making him sound more vulnerable and alone than
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&3/6ever. Happily, he has a booming, old-fashioned voice more than up to the task.One other song hints at the heights this show can reach: the two pairs of lovers are riding on the subway toGabey's rescue when they realize time is slipping away and the sailors will soon be going back on board and offto war. They sing the wistful ballad "Some Other Time" with real poignancy. It's a rare moment of emotion for ashow with a generic set, what feels like lots of filler and a desperate desire to yuk it up before we've even begunto know the people at hand.Having seen the joyous '98 revival, I know this show isn't dated or not up to its reputation. Of course not everynight on the town can be memorable. But every production of On The Town should be; the songs, the story andthe brilliant original production are too rich to accept anything less.THE BELLE OF AMHERST ** out of **** WESTSIDE THEATREThe plays of William Luce are resolutely out of fashion. He's been on Broadway four times but never verysuccessfully in commercial terms. Often one-person shows about a famous figure (I would say "always" butBarrymore has two characters and another has some off-stage voices), they are dead cheap to stage, catnip foractors wanting to tackle an iconic figure while chewing the scenery and perennial favorites in regional theatersaround the world, I presume.Actor John Barrymore, writer Isak Dinesen, flapper Zelda Fitzgerald, playwright Lillian Hellman, author CharlotteBronte, war hero Patton: Luce has done them all in one form or another. Most famously, he did poet EmilyDickinson in a one-woman show that the great Julie Harris won a Tony for and happily toured the country withfor many years.Now The Belle Of Amherst returns with Joely Richardson as the reputedly hermit-like but actually vivid poetesswho is here to share a recipe or two, joke about her reputation with the locals and quote liberally from her poetryand letters to give a sense of the rich emotional life enjoyed by one of America's greatest poets. (Only WaltWhitman rivals Dickinson in influence. All others descend from them.)I'd never seen Harris on stage or in the PBS taping of this show. I've never read a biography of Dickinson andonly know her life in the most broad brushstroke terms. So Richardson might have done just about anything. Aslong as it was internally consistent and convincing, I would have been happy. Still, somehow I don't imagineDickinson was like this.Often seen as a virtual hermit, Dickinson has been revealed to have numerous passions and disappointmentsdespite rarely wandering from her door. She had a deep apparently epistolary romance with a married man thatcame to nought, a lengthy exchange with the editor of The Atlantic Monthly that led to professionaldisappointment after he insisted her poems weren't truly worthy (he also dissed Whitman), a distant mother, aloving father, a co-dependent sister who freaked out at the possibility of Dickinson ever leaving and so on.Between all that and gossipy locals, life wasn't so dull for Dickinson.But Richardson strives so mightily to inject emotion and passion and turmoil into the words of Dickinson, that theresult seems hyper-dramatic and overwrought. I've admired Richardson onstage -- most recently in the ClassicStage Company's Ivanov. Here she seems unprepared and entirely at sea. The performance I saw includednumerous stumbles over the text, beginning at the start and right up to the climactic recitation of Dickinson'sfamous "Because I could not stop for Death."My temptation is to blame the play. Luce's stumbling over the life of Dickinson in this production felt ramblingand incoherent. Fact follows fact with no rhyme or reason and it would seem a challenge to remember thisrambling recitation of details. That editor of The Atlantic? His imminent arrival is the finale of act one andimmediately dealt with in act two. The one, true love? He's barely introduced as her heart's real passion before
12/16/2015Theater: Tepid Nite 'On The Town;' Overwrought 'Belle' | Evernote Web
https://www.evernote.com/Home.action#n=7a857a6b-002e-4855-aa4f-86767f7a8dc5&ses=4&sh=2&sds=5&4/6it's all over. Did Emily mention her father loves animals? No, she hadn't and why should we care? A distantmother? Discussed briefly and then it's resolved because as mother grew frail, Emily was able to establish somelong-sought intimacy.One-person shows about famous folk often devolve into "and then I did...." Perhaps a more focused tale thatzeroed in on her crushing reception by the editor of The Atlantic would have created more drama for this story.Certainly Richardson is at her best as Dickinson realizes not only won't he publish her work but he doesn't thinkanyone else should either.Too often, random moment follows random moment, with Richardson either making a hash of the poetry orinjecting melodrama into a voice that -- in poetry -- surely is better evoked as wry and intelligent and coolyobservant, whatever the demands of the stage.The poet who wrote this is someone I'd love to meet:"Faith is a fine invention When Gentlemen can see-- But Microscopes are prudent In an Emergency.Sadly, she is not present in The Belle of Amherst.THEATER OF 2014Beautiful: The Carole King Musical ***Rodney King *** Hard Times ** 1/2 Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead ** I Could Say More * The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner ** Machinal *** Outside Mullingar *** A Man's A Man * 1/2 The Tribute Artist ** 1/2 Transport ** Prince Igor at the Met ** The Bridges Of Madison County ** 1/2 Kung Fu (at Signature) ** Stage Kiss *** Satchmo At The Waldorf *** Antony and Cleopatra at the Public ** All The Way ** 1/2 The Open House (Will Eno at Signature) ** 1/2 Wozzeck (at Met w Deborah Voigt and Thomas Hampson and Simon O'Neill) Hand To God *** Tales From Red Vienna ** Appropriate (at Signature) * Rocky * 1/2 Aladdin *** Mothers And Sons ** Les Miserables *** 1/2